Competitor Price Monitoring, Built for Your Market
Daily competitor price tracking from the comparison sites and public pages you are priced against. Normalised, ranked the way your team already works, every figure traceable, and honest about what it cannot see. Built once, no subscription.
What competitor price monitoring looks like when it is built for you
If your market is priced against a handful of comparison sites, marketplaces or rival price lists, someone on your team already does competitor price monitoring. They do it by opening a dozen tabs every morning, reading prices off screens and typing them into a spreadsheet. It works until they are busy, and nobody can say afterwards where a given number came from.
I replace that routine with a collector that reads every source on a schedule, normalises what it finds into the ranked tables your team already uses, and delivers them before the working day starts. Each price carries the seller, the source it came from, the product exactly as that source described it, and the conditions that decide whether the price is real for your customer: a minimum spend, a minimum deposit, a bundle, a term.
The savings provider case study is the worked example: four comparison platforms, around 460 products a run, ten ranked tables emailed daily, two weeks from brief to live, replacing around two and a half hours a day of typing.
What you get
Your format, not a dashboard
Ranked tables in the order your team already reads them, by product, term or category, with per-source breakdowns next to the pooled market view. Delivered by email or into a sheet. A dashboard only if someone will actually open it.
Normalised across sources
Every site names the same product differently. "1 Year", "12 months" and "Fixed 12 month" land in the same row, and the original wording is kept alongside so a number that looks wrong is traceable in seconds.
A report that checks itself
Every run writes a health block naming each source and how many products it returned. The send step checks the data date first. If the figures are not fresh, the subject line says so, because stale prices acted on are worse than no report.
On demand when a rival moves
Two independent schedulers, retries within each run, and a refresh-and-resend from a phone for the mornings a competitor moves early. Reliability engineered rather than hoped for.
Built once versus rented monthly
Competitor price monitoring is mostly sold as software: a subscription tool built for the average market, charged every month for as long as you use it. That is the right buy for some businesses, and the wrong one for many of the teams who search for it.
A build is different in three ways. It covers the sources you are actually priced against, including the awkward regional comparison site the tools do not connect to. It carries the conditions that matter in your market, which a generic price field flattens away. And it is yours: the code and documentation are handed over, there is no monthly fee, and when a source changes its layout the fix is a small one-off job.
When a tool is the better answer. If you sell thousands of SKUs on standard marketplaces that the monitoring tools already connect to, or you need automated repricing rather than a report, buy the tool. I will tell you that on the scoping call rather than build something you could have rented.
How a build runs
- Scoping call. Which sources, which products, which conditions decide whether a price is real for your customer, and what the report looks like today. A fixed price follows.
- Discovery per source. Each site is tested for the full inventory: pagination, content that renders after load, listings split across URLs, and sources that serve automated clients something different.
- Collector and normalisation. One collection strategy per source, then a normalisation layer that maps every source's naming onto your product structure and keeps the original wording.
- Report, health checks, scheduling. Your tables, the per-source health block, the freshness check in the send step, two schedulers, retries, on-demand refresh.
- Verification and handover. Figures checked against the sources by hand for the first runs, then documentation and code handed over. Running daily, unattended.
What it does not do
It does not take data you are not entitled to. I collect what a source publishes to an ordinary visitor. Where a site withholds figures from automated clients because they originate with a commercial data provider, the report names that gap and the right route is a licence. In the savings case, one platform did exactly this, and the report says so on its face.
It does not reprice for you. It gives your team the market at nine instead of eleven, with numbers they can defend. The commercial response is still a person's decision.
It is not immune to change. When a source redesigns, that collector returns less and the health block says so the same morning. That is the design working. The fix is small and one-off, which is the trade for never typing the tables again.
Questions
How is this different from a competitor price monitoring tool?
Which sources can be monitored?
Is competitor price monitoring allowed?
How often does it run and how is it delivered?
What does it cost?
Related
Tell me which sites your team checks every morning
Send me the sources and what the report looks like today. I will tell you plainly whether a build beats a tool for your market, what it would involve, and a fixed price. Based in Manchester, working with clients anywhere in the UK.
Get in Touch